Skip to main content
Logo image

Section Completing the Product Rule

In algebra, a clever rearrangement of terms can make an equation easier to solve. For instance, consider the quadratic:
\begin{equation*} x^2 + 10x + 25 = 0. \end{equation*}
Factoring the left-hand side gives:
\begin{equation} (x + 5)^2 = 0.\tag{13} \end{equation}
This grouping is helpful because taking the square root immediately reveals the solution.
Some first-order differential equations benefit from a similar idea. Instead of forming a single perfect square, we aim to group the left-hand side as a single derivative.
For example, take the equation:
\begin{equation} \frac{dy}{dx} + 2 y = 5\text{.}\tag{14} \end{equation}
It can be rewritten as:
\begin{equation} \frac{d}{dx} [e^{2x} y] = 5e^{2x}\text{.}\tag{15} \end{equation}
Just like factoring helped earlier, this new form makes solving easier, only now we integrate instead of take square roots.
We’ll call this process β€œcompleting the product rule”. It’s based on reversing the product rule from calculus and serves as the foundation of the integrating factor method.

Subsection The Product Rule, A Quick Review

Before we reverse the product rule, let’s make sure we remember how it works in the forward direction.
In calculus, the product rule tells us how to take the derivative of two multiplied functions. If \(f(x)\) and \(g(x)\) are differentiable, then
\begin{equation*} \frac{d}{dx} \left[ f(x) \cdot g(x) \right] = f(x) \cdot g'(x) + f'(x) \cdot g(x)\text{.} \end{equation*}
To refresh your memory of how it works, try the following practice problems.

Checkpoint 70. πŸ“–β“ Remembering the Product Rule.

Compute each of the derivatives below. Assume \(y\) is a function of \(x\text{.}\)
\begin{equation*} 1. \quad \left[x^6 e^{3x}\right]' \hspace{5em} 2. \quad \frac{d}{dx}\left[e^{x^3} y\right] \end{equation*}
  1. \(\displaystyle\frac{d}{dx}\left[x^6 e^{3x}\right] =\)
  2. \(\displaystyle\left[e^{x^3} y\right]' =\)
Use y' for the derivative of \(y\) in question 2.

Subsection The Product Rule in Reverse

Now that we’ve recalled how the product rule works, let’s try running it in reverse.
Suppose you’re given the expression:
\begin{equation} \frac{1}{x} \sin x + \cos x \ln x\text{.}\tag{16} \end{equation}
Can this be written as the derivative of a product? That is, can you find functions \(f(x)\) and \(g(x)\) so that
\begin{equation*} \frac{d}{dx} \left[ f(x) g(x) \right] = \frac{1}{x} \sin x + \cos x \ln x? \end{equation*}
Here’s a tip: the product rule always combines four pieces, two functions and their derivatives. If you can spot \(f\) and \(g\) in the terms, the rest should fall into place. In this case, trying \(f(x) = \sin x\) and \(g(x) = \ln x\) works out perfectly.
Let’s get some practice with this reverse thinking.

🌌 Example 71. Basic Reverse Product Rule.

Rewrite each expression as a derivative of a product:
\begin{equation*} 1. \quad e^{x}\cos x + e^{x}\sin x \hspace{5em} 2. \quad \frac{e^{x^2}}{x} + 2 x \ln x e^{x^2} \end{equation*}
Solution.
Solution 1.
First, select an \(f\) and \(g\) in different terms, like so
\begin{equation*} e^x\ \underset{\Large f}{ \underset{\uparrow}{\ul{\vphantom{|}\cos x}}} + \underset{\Large g}{ \underset{\uparrow}{\ul{\vphantom{|}e^x}}}\ \sin x\text{.} \end{equation*}
For this to work, \(f'\) should be \(\sin x\text{,}\) next to our chosen \(g\text{.}\) However,
\begin{equation*} f' = [\cos x]' = -\sin x \ne \sin x \quad ❌ \end{equation*}
So this labeling doesn’t work and we instead try the labels
\begin{equation*} \underset{\Large f}{ \underset{\uparrow}{\ul{\vphantom{|}e^x}}}\ \cos x + e^x\ \underset{\Large g}{ \underset{\uparrow}{\ul{\vphantom{|}\sin x}}}\text{.} \end{equation*}
Noting that \(f' = [e^x]' = e^x\) is next to \(g\) and \(g' = [\sin x]' = \cos x\) is next to \(f\) confirms this is a valid product rule. Therefore, we can reverse the product rule as
\begin{equation*} e^x \cos x + e^x \sin x = [e^x \sin x]'\text{.} \end{equation*}
Solution 2.
To make this easier, let’s separate the terms as
\begin{equation*} \frac{1}{x} e^{x^2} + \ln x (2 x e^{x^2})\text{.} \end{equation*}
So, as before, we first set \(f\) and \(g\)
\begin{equation*} \frac{1}{x}\ \underset{\Large f}{ \underset{\uparrow}{\ul{\vphantom{|}e^{x^2}}}} + \underset{\Large g}{ \underset{\uparrow}{\ul{\vphantom{|}\ln x}}}\ 2 x e^{x^2}\text{,} \end{equation*}
then verify the derivatives of \(f\) and \(g\) are in the other terms,
\begin{equation*} f' = \left[e^{x^2}\right]' = 2 x e^{x^2} \quad βœ… \qquad g' = \left[\ln x\right]' = \frac{1}{x} \quad βœ…\text{.} \end{equation*}
Therefore,
\begin{equation*} \frac{e^{x^2}}{x} + 2 x \ln x e^{x^2} = \left[e^{x^2} \ln x\right]'\text{.} \end{equation*}
Let’s now try expressions involving a variable function, like \(y(x)\text{.}\) These are the ones we’ll actually encounter when solving differential equations.

🌌 Example 72. Reversed Product Rule with a Variable.

Rewrite each expression in the form \([f(x) y(x)]'\text{.}\)
\begin{equation*} 1. \quad e^{9x}\frac{dy}{dx} + 9y e^{9x} \hspace{5em} 2. \quad e^{1/x}y' - \frac{e^{1/x}}{x^2}y \end{equation*}
Solution.
Solution 1.
Since \(dy/dx\) and \(y\) are in separate terms, setting \(g\) to \(y\) gives you \(g'\) and \(f\) for free since
\begin{equation*} \underset{\Large f}{ \underset{\uparrow}{\ul{e^{9x}}}}\ \underset{\Large g'}{ \underset{\uparrow}{\ul{\vphantom{|}\frac{dy}{dx}}}} + \underset{\Large g}{ \underset{\uparrow}{\ul{\vphantom{|}y}}}\ (9 e^{9x})\text{.} \end{equation*}
The only thing you need to check is
\begin{equation*} f' = [e^{9x}]' = 9e^{9x} \quad βœ… \end{equation*}
which is sitting right next to \(g\text{.}\) Therefore, we have
\begin{equation*} e^{9x}\frac{dy}{dx} + 9 e^{9x} y = \left[e^{9x} y\right]'\text{.} \end{equation*}
Solution 2.
Again, set \(g\) to \(y\) and the rest fall into place as
\begin{equation*} \underset{\Large f}{ \underset{\uparrow}{\ul{e^{1/x}}}}\ \underset{\Large g'}{ \underset{\uparrow}{\ul{\vphantom{|}y'}}} + \left(-\frac{e^{1/x}}{x^2}\right)\ \underset{\Large g}{ \underset{\uparrow}{\ul{\vphantom{|}y}}}\text{.} \end{equation*}
The only thing left to do is verify the derivative of \(f\text{:}\)
\begin{equation*} f' = \left[e^{1/x}\right]' = e^{1/x}\left[\frac{1}{x}\right]^\prime = e^{1/x}\left(-\frac{1}{x^2}\right) = -\frac{e^{1/x}}{x^2} \quad βœ…\text{.} \end{equation*}
So, we can reverse the product rule as
\begin{equation*} e^{1/x}y' - \frac{e^{1/x}}{x^2}y = \left[e^{1/x} y\right]'\text{.} \end{equation*}

Checkpoint 73. πŸ“–β“ What’s Missing in the Product Rule.

Fill in the missing parts of each product rule below.
\(\ds\frac{d}{dx}\left[x^2 \cos x\right] = \) \(x^2 \cdot\) \(+\) \(\cdot \cos x\)
\(\ds\frac{d}{dx}\big[e^{3x} \) \(\big] = \) \(\ds\frac{1}{x} \cdot e^{3x} + \) \(e^{3x} \cdot \ln x \)
\(\ds\frac{d}{dx}\big[ \) \(\cdot \) \(\big] = \) \(\ds\frac{dP}{dt} \cdot t + P \)
While reversing the product rule isn’t a standard technique, practicing it a few times helps build the intuition you’ll need when working with integrating factors.

Subsection Completing the Product Rule: An Analogy and a Method

Completing the square is a classic strategy from algebra: by adding just the right constant, we can turn a messy quadratic into something easily solvable.
For example, to solve
\begin{equation*} \os{\large\text{incomplete square}}{\qquad \ob{\ x^2 + 6x\ } = -1}\text{,} \end{equation*}
we complete the square by adding \(9\) (since \((6/2)^2 = 9\)) to both sides:
\begin{equation*} \ub{x^2 + 6x + 9}_{\large\text{complete square}} = -1 + 9\text{,} \end{equation*}
which gives a perfect square:
\begin{equation*} (x + 3)^2 = 8, \end{equation*}
and from here we solve by taking square roots. Simple and neat.

Checkpoint 74. πŸ“–β“ Purpose of Adding \(9\).

In the analogy, what role does the number \(9\) play in the quadratic equation?
  • The missing piece that allows the quadratic expression to be rewritten as a perfect square.
  • Correct! The number 9 completes the square, making it factorable.
  • The solution to the quadratic equation.
  • Incorrect. The number 9 is introduced to complete the square, not as a solution.
  • The coefficient of the linear term.
  • Incorrect. The coefficient of the linear term in the quadratic equation is 6, not 9.
  • A randomly chosen constant added to balance the equation.
  • Incorrect. The number 9 is carefully selected to form a perfect square trinomial.
Now let’s look at a differential equation that behaves almost exactly the same way:
\begin{equation*} \os{\large\text{incomplete product rule}}{\qquad \ob{\ \frac{dy}{dx} + 6 y\ } = -1}\text{.} \end{equation*}
The left-hand side looks like it wants to be the result of a product rule. And it could be, if we multiply both sides by \(e^{6x}\text{:}\)
\begin{equation*} \ub{e^{6x} \frac{dy}{dx} + 6e^{6x} y}_{\large\text{complete product rule}} = -e^{6x}\text{.} \end{equation*}
That multiplication β€œcompletes the product rule” the same way adding \(9\) completed the square. Now, the left-hand side is exactly:
\begin{equation*} \frac{d}{dx} \left[ e^{6x} y \right] = -e^{6x}. \end{equation*}

Checkpoint 75. πŸ“–β“ Purpose of Multiply \(e^{6x}\).

Why do we multiply both sides of
\begin{equation*} \frac{dy}{dx} + 6y = -1 \end{equation*}
by \(e^{6x}\text{?}\)
  • To complete a product rule within this equation.
  • Correct! Multiplying by \(e^{6x}\) allows us to rewrite the left-hand side as a perfect derivative.
  • To eliminate the derivative term entirely.
  • Incorrect. The goal is not to eliminate the derivative, but to structure the equation so it can be integrated directly.
  • To make the right-hand side equal to zero.
  • Incorrect. The right-hand side is transformed, but it does not become zero.
  • It makes the equation linear.
  • Incorrect. The equation already linear. Moreover, multiplying by any function of \(x\) will not change the equation’s linearity.
And just like we took a square root to solve a completed square, here we integrate both sides to solve a completed product rule:
\begin{align*} \int \frac{d}{dx}\left[ e^{6x} y \right]\, dx \amp = \int -e^{6x}\, dx \\ e^{6x} y \amp = -\frac{1}{6} e^{6x} + c \\ y \amp = -\frac{1}{6} + c e^{-6x} \end{align*}
So what’s the big idea here? Just as completing the square gives us a clean square to work with, completing the product rule gives us a clean product rule, one we can reverse and integrate.
This technique, multiplying by the right function to complete the product rule, is the heart of the integrating factor method. And it raises an important question:
How do we know what function to multiply by?
That’s what we’ll figure out in the next section.

Subsection πŸ“€ Wrap-Up

πŸ—οΈ \(\textbf{Key Takeaways...}\)
  • Completing the square transforms a quadratic into a perfect square to make it easier to solve.
  • A similar idea applies to differential equations: we can β€œcomplete the product rule” by multiplying both sides of the equation by a carefully chosen function.
  • This multiplication turns the left-hand side into the derivative of a product, making the equation easier to solve through direct integration.
  • Completing the product rule is conceptually similar to completing the square, both introduce a missing piece that simplifies the structure of the equation.
  • This technique is the core of the integrating factor method, which is used to solve first-order linear differential equations.
  • The big question now is: how do we systematically choose the right function to multiply by? That’s the focus of the next section.

Check Your Understanding.

Checkpoint 77. πŸ€”πŸ’­ Separation of Variables Reading Questions.
(a) πŸ€”πŸ’­ Recognizing an Incomplete Product Rule.
Why do we say the differential equation
\begin{equation*} \frac{dy}{dx} + 6y = -1 \end{equation*}
contains an incomplete product rule?
  • It lacks a function needed to reverse a product rule.
  • Correct! The equation is missing an essential function that would allow it to be rewritten using the product rule.
  • Because we haven’t used the product rule yet.
  • Incorrect. The issue is not that the product rule hasn’t been applied, but that the equation is not structured as a product rule.
  • It has a free term of \(-1\text{.}\)
  • Incorrect. While the free term is \(-1\text{,}\) the issue is related to the structure of the left-hand side.
  • It is not in standard form.
  • Incorrect. The equation actually is in standard form.
(b) πŸ€”πŸ’­ Equivalent Equations.
The differential equation,
\begin{equation*} \frac{dQ}{dz}\ln z + \frac{Q}{z} = \tan\left(z^2\right) \end{equation*}
is equivalent to which of the following equations? Hint: use the forward product rule in the answer choices.
  • \(\quad\ds\frac{d}{dz} \left[ Q z \right] = \tan\left(z^2\right)\)
  • Incorrect. This equation does not account for the logarithmic term in the original differential equation.
  • \(\quad\ds\frac{dQ}{dz} = \tan\left(z^2\right)\)
  • Incorrect. This equation does not account for the logarithmic term in the original differential equation.
  • \(\quad\ds\frac{d}{dz} \left[ Q \ln z \right] = \tan\left(z^2\right)\)
  • Correct! Applying the product rule to the left side of the equation yields the original differential equation.
  • \(\quad\ds\frac{d}{dz} \left[ \frac{Q}{z} \right] = \tan\left(z^2\right)\)
  • Incorrect. This equation does not account for the logarithmic term in the original differential equation.
(c) πŸ€”πŸ’­ Goal of Completing the Product Rule.
How does reversing the product rule help solve this equation?
\begin{equation*} \frac{dy}{dx} \cdot e^{5x^2} + 10x e^{5x^2} \cdot y = 3x\text{.} \end{equation*}
  • It groups terms on one side of the equation into a single derivative.
  • Correct! The product rule combines terms on the left side of the equation into a single derivative.
  • It computes the derivative of a product of two functions.
  • Incorrect. In this situation, the product rule is not used to take a derivative of a product of two functions.
  • It solves the differential equation directly.
  • Incorrect. The product rule can help solve some differential equations, but it does not solve them alone.
  • It allows it to be easily solved by direct integration.
  • Correct! Recognizing a perfect derivative lets us solve the equation by integration.
  • It converts a nonlinear equation into a linear one.
  • Incorrect. The equation is already linear; reversing the product rule does not change its nature.
(d) πŸ€”πŸ’­ Seeing the Pattern.
Given that you can multiply the equation
\begin{equation*} \frac{dy}{dx} + 6y = -1 \end{equation*}
by the function \(e^{6x}\) to transform it into
\begin{equation*} \frac{d}{dx}\left[e^{6x}y\right] = -e^{6x} \end{equation*}
What function would you think to multiply onto the equation
\begin{equation*} \frac{dy}{dx} - 8y = 3x \end{equation*}
to accomplish the same goal?
  • \(\quad\ds e^{3x}\)
  • Incorrect. Review the example carefully.
  • \(\quad\ds e^{8x}\)
  • Incorrect. Review the example carefully.
  • \(\quad\ds e^{-8x}\)
  • That’s correct! Multiplying by \(e^{8x}\) will allow you to complete the product rule on the left side of the equation.
  • \(\quad\ds \frac38 x\)
  • Incorrect. Review the example carefully.
You have attempted of activities on this page.