Incorrect, even though \(n^3\) is the most significant part for all of these formulas, the way it interacts with the rest of the equation is also important to note.
\(45 n^3 + 1710 n^2 + 16 n + 5\)
Incorrect, even though \(n^3\) is the most significant part for all of these formulas, the way it interacts with the rest of the equation is also important to note.
This can be dependent on the machine, programming language, and other factors
the number of steps
Yes, when quantifying the time it takes to execute an algorithm we base it on the number of steps it takes to solve the problem, not the time it takes
the readability of the code
No, a very efficient algorithm can be programmed efficiently in C++ without any extra spaces making it unreadable, however the solution would still be efficient.