In Figure 4.3.1, we see evidence that increasing the number of rectangles in a Riemann sum improves the accuracy of the approximation of the net signed area bounded by the given function.
Figure4.3.1.At left and center, two left Riemann sums for a function that is sometimes negative; at right, the exact areas bounded by on the interval .
We therefore explore the natural idea of allowing the number of rectangles to increase without bound. In an effort to compute the exact net signed area we also consider the differences among left, right, and middle Riemann sums and the different results they generate as the value of increases. We begin with functions that are exclusively positive on the interval under consideration.
Initially, the calculator shows a left Riemann sum with subintervals for the function on the interval . Use the applet to compute the following sums for this function on this interval.
Note that the graph isn’t a familiar geometric shape, so you can’t use a geometric formula to calculate the exact area bounded by and the -axis on the interval .
However, you can observe any patterns you see in the calculations above, and make an educated guess of the exact area bounded by and the -axis on the interval .
Subsection4.3.1The definition of the definite integral
In Preview Activity 4.3.1, we saw that as the number of rectangles got larger and larger, the values of ,, and all grew closer and closer to the same value. It turns out that this occurs for any continuous function on an interval , and also for a Riemann sum using any point in the interval . Thus, as we let , it doesn’t really matter where we choose to evaluate the function within a given subinterval, because
That these limits always exist (and share the same value) when is continuous 2
It turns out that a function need not be continuous in order to have a definite integral. For our purposes, we assume that the functions we consider are continuous on the interval(s) of interest. It is straightforward to see that any function that is piecewise continuous on an interval of interest will also have a well-defined definite integral.
We call the symbol the integral sign, the values and the limits of integration, and the function the integrand. The process of determining the real number is called evaluating the definite integral. While there are several different interpretations of the definite integral, for now the most important is that measures the net signed area bounded by and the -axis on the interval .
For example, if is the function pictured in Figure 4.3.3, and ,, and are the exact areas bounded by and the -axis on the respective intervals ,, and , then
We can also use definite integrals to express the change in position and the distance traveled by a moving object. If is a velocity function on an interval , then the change in position of the object, , is given by
If the velocity function is nonnegative on , then tells us the distance the object traveled. If the velocity is sometimes negative on , we can use definite integrals to find the areas bounded by the function on each interval where does not change sign, and the sum of these areas will tell us the distance the object traveled.
To compute the value of a definite integral from the definition, we have to take the limit of a sum. While this is possible to do in select circumstances, it is also tedious and time-consuming, and does not offer much additional insight into the meaning or interpretation of the definite integral. Instead, in Section 4.4, we will learn the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, which provides a shortcut for evaluating a large class of definite integrals. This will enable us to determine the exact net signed area bounded by a continuous function and the -axis in many circumstances.
For now, our goal is to understand the meaning and properties of the definite integral, rather than to compute its value. To do this, we will rely on the net signed area interpretation of the definite integral. So we will use as examples curves that produce regions whose areas we can compute exactly through area formulas. We can thus compute the exact value of the corresponding integral.
For instance, if we wish to evaluate the definite integral , we observe that the region bounded by this function and the -axis is the trapezoid shown in Figure 4.3.4. By the formula for the area of a trapezoid, , so
Subsection4.3.2Some properties of the definite integral
Regarding the definite integral of a function over an interval as the net signed area bounded by and the -axis, we discover several standard properties of the definite integral. It is helpful to remember that the definite integral is defined in terms of Riemann sums, which consist of the areas of rectangles.
While this rule is easy to see if , it in fact holds in general for any values of ,, and . Another property of the definite integral states that if we reverse the order of the limits of integration, we change the sign of the integral’s value.
This result makes sense because if we integrate from to , then in the defining Riemann sum we set , while if we integrate from to , we have , and this is the only change in the sum used to define the integral.
There are two additional useful properties of the definite integral. When we worked with derivative rules in Chapter 2, we formulated the Constant Multiple Rule and the Sum Rule. Recall that the Constant Multiple Rule says that if is a differentiable function and is a constant, then
These rules are useful because they allow to deal individually with the simplest parts of certain functions by taking advantage of addition and multiplying by a constant. In other words, the process of taking the derivative respects addition and multiplying by constants in the simplest possible way.
Because multiplying the function by 2 doubles its height at every -value, we see that the height of each rectangle in a left Riemann sum is doubled, for the original function, versus in the doubled function. For the areas and , it follows . As this is true regardless of the value of or the type of sum we use, we see that in the limit, the area of the red region bounded by will be twice the area of the blue region bounded by . As there is nothing special about the value compared to an arbitrary constant , the following general principle holds.
If we take the sum of two functions and at every point in the interval, the height of the function is given by . Hence, for the pictured rectangles with areas ,, and , it follows that . Because this will occur for every such rectangle, in the limit the area of the gray region will be the sum of the areas of the blue and red regions. In terms of definite integrals, we have the following general rule.
Subsection4.3.3How the definite integral is connected to a function’s average value
One of the most valuable applications of the definite integral is that it provides a way to discuss the average value of a function, even for a function that takes on infinitely many values. Recall that if we wish to take the average of numbers ,,,, we compute
Since integrals arise from Riemann sums in which we add values of a function, it should not be surprising that evaluating an integral is similar to averaging the output values of a function. Consider, for instance, the right Riemann sum of a function , which is given by
We see that the right Riemann sum with subintervals is just the length of the interval times the average of the function values found at the right endpoints. And just as with our efforts to compute area, the larger the value of we use, the more accurate our average will be. Indeed, we will define the average value of on to be
But we also know that for any continuous function on , taking the limit of a Riemann sum leads precisely to the definite integral. That is, , and thus taking the limit as in Equation (4.3.1), we have that
Equation (4.3.2) tells us another way to interpret the definite integral: the definite integral of a function from to is the length of the interval times the average value of the function on the interval. In addition, when the function is nonnegative on , Equation (4.3.2) has a natural visual interpretation.
Consider Figure 4.3.9, where we see at left the shaded region whose area is , at center the shaded rectangle whose dimensions are by , and at right these two figures superimposed. Note that in dark green we show the horizontal line . Thus, the area of the green rectangle is given by , which is precisely the value of . The area of the blue region in the left figure is the same as the area of the green rectangle in the center figure. We can also observe that the areas and in the rightmost figure appear to be equal. Thus, knowing the average value of a function enables us to construct a rectangle whose area is the same as the value of the definite integral of the function on the interval. This applet 3
gvsu.edu/s/az
provides an opportunity to explore how the average value of the function changes as the interval changes, through an image similar to that found in Figure 4.3.9.
Suppose that tells us the instantaneous velocity of a moving object on the interval , where is measured in minutes and is measured in meters per minute.
Sketch an accurate graph of . What kind of curve is ?
Evaluate exactly.
In terms of the physical problem of the moving object with velocity , what is the meaning of ? Include units on your answer.
Determine the exact average value of on . Include units on your answer.
Sketch a rectangle whose base is the line segment from to on the -axis such that the rectangle’s area is equal to the value of . What is the rectangle’s exact height?
How can you use the average value you found in (d) to compute the total distance traveled by the moving object over ?
Any Riemann sum of a continuous function on an interval provides an estimate of the net signed area bounded by the function and the horizontal axis on the interval. Increasing the number of subintervals in the Riemann sum improves the accuracy of this estimate, and letting the number of subintervals increase without bound results in the values of the corresponding Riemann sums approaching the exact value of the enclosed net signed area.
When we take the limit of Riemann sums, we arrive at what we call the definite integral of over the interval . In particular, the symbol denotes the definite integral of over , and this quantity is defined by the equation
,
where , (for ), and satisfies (for ).
The definite integral measures the exact net signed area bounded by and the horizontal axis on ; in addition, the value of the definite integral is related to what we call the average value of the function on :AVG. In the setting where we consider the integral of a velocity function , measures the exact change in position of the moving object on ; when is nonnegative, is the object’s distance traveled on .
The definite integral is a sophisticated sum, and thus has some of the same natural properties that finite sums have. Perhaps most important of these is how the definite integral respects sums and constant multiples of functions, which can be summarized by the rule
where and are continuous functions on and and are arbitrary constants.
Coal gas is produced at a gasworks. Pollutants in the gas are removed by scrubbers, which become less and less efficient as time goes on. The following measurements, made at the start of each month, show the rate at which pollutants are escaping (in tons/month) in the gas:
The following table gives the the approximate amount of emissions, , of nitrogen oxides in millions of metric tons per year in the US. Let be the number of years since 1940 and .
The velocity of an object moving along an axis is given by the piecewise linear function that is pictured in Figure 4.3.10. Assume that the object is moving to the right when its velocity is positive, and moving to the left when its velocity is negative. Assume that the given velocity function is valid for to .
Write an expression involving definite integrals whose value is the total change in position of the object on the interval .
Use the provided graph of to determine the value of the total change in position on .
Write an expression involving definite integrals whose value is the total distance traveled by the object on . What is the exact value of the total distance traveled on ?
What is the object’s exact average velocity on ?
Find an algebraic formula for the object’s position function on that satisfies .
) to compute Riemann sums to estimate the object’s total change in position on . Work to ensure that your estimate is accurate to two decimal places, and explain how you know this to be the case.
Write an expression involving definite integrals whose value is the total distance traveled by the object on .
Use appropriate technology to compute Riemann sums to estimate the object’s total distance travelled on . Work to ensure that your estimate is accurate to two decimal places, and explain how you know this to be the case.
What is the object’s average velocity on , accurate to two decimal places?