Another important application of the definite integral measures the likelihood of certain events. For instance, consider a company that manufactures incandescent light bulbs. Based on a large volume of test results, they have determined that the fraction of light bulbs that fail between times and of use (where is measured in months) is given by
Thus about 14.22% of all lightbulbs fail between and . Clearly we could adjust the limits of integration to measure the fraction of light bulbs that fail during any time period of interest.
A company with a large customer base has a call center that receives thousands of calls a day. After studying the data that represents how long callers wait for assistance, they find that the function models the time customers wait in the following way: the fraction of customers who wait between and minutes is given by
In view of the above examples, we see that we may want to integrate over an interval whose upper limit grows without bound. For example, to find the fraction of light bulbs that fail eventually, we wish to find
Figure6.5.1.At left, the area bounded by on the finite interval ; at right, the result of letting . By “” in the righthand figure, we mean that the region extends to the right without bound.
are all improper because they have limits of integration that involve . To evaluate an improper integral we replace it with a limit of proper integrals. That is,
We first attempt to evaluate using the First FTC, and then evaluate the limit. Is it even possible for the area of an unbounded region to be finite? The following activity explores this issue and others in more detail.
Use the First FTC to determine the exact values of ,, and . Then, use your computational device to compute a decimal approximation of each result.
Use the First FTC to evaluate the definite integral (which results in an expression that depends on ).
Now, use your work from (ii.) to evaluate the limit given by
.
Next, we investigate .
Use the First FTC to determine the exact values of ,, and . Then, use your calculator to compute a decimal approximation of each result.
Use the First FTC to evaluate the definite integral (which results in an expression that depends on ).
Now, use your work from (ii.) to evaluate the limit given by
.
Plot the functions and on the same coordinate axes for the values . How would you compare their behavior as increases without bound? What is similar? What is different?
How would you characterize the value of ? of ? What does this tell us about the respective areas bounded by these two curves for ?
Activity 6.5.2 suggests that is either finite or infinite (or it doesn’t exist). With these possibilities in mind, we introduce the following terminology.
We will restrict our interest to improper integrals for which the integrand is nonnegative. Also, we require that , for if does not approach as , then it is impossible for to converge.
Because has a vertical asymptote at , is not continuous on , and the integral represents the area of the unbounded region shown at right in Figure 6.5.2.
Figure6.5.2.At left, the area bounded by on the finite interval ; at right, the result of letting , where we see that the shaded region will extend vertically without bound.
We address the problem of the integrand being unbounded by replacing the improper integral with a limit of proper integrals. For example, to evaluate , we replace with and let approach 0 from the right. Thus,
We evaluate the proper integral , and then take the limit. We will say that the improper integral converges if this limit exists, and diverges otherwise. In this example, we observe that
We have to be particularly careful with unbounded integrands, for they may arise in ways that may not initially be obvious. Consider, for instance, the integral
At first glance we might think that we can simply apply the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus by antidifferentiating to get and then evaluating from to . Were we to do so, we would be erroneously applying the FTC because fails to be continuous throughout the interval, as seen in Figure 6.5.3.
Such an incorrect application of the FTC leads to an impossible result (), which would itself suggest that something we did must be wrong. Instead, we must address the vertical asymptote at by writing
since as approaches 2 from the left. Thus, the improper integral diverges; similar work shows that also diverges. From either of these two results, we can conclude that that the original integral, diverges, too.
For each of the following definite integrals, decide whether the integral is improper or not. If the integral is proper, evaluate it using the First FTC. If the integral is improper, determine whether or not the integral converges or diverges; if the integral converges, find its exact value.
An integral can be improper if at least one of or is , making the interval unbounded, or if has a vertical asymptote at for some value of that satisfies . One reason that improper integrals are important is that certain probabilities can be represented by integrals that involve infinite limits.
When we encounter an improper integral, we work to understand it by replacing the improper integral with a limit of proper integrals. For instance, we write
,
and then work to determine whether the limit exists and is finite. For any improper integral, if the resulting limit of proper integrals exists and is finite, we say the improper integral converges. Otherwise, the improper integral diverges.
An important class of improper integrals is given by
where is a positive real number. We can show that this improper integral converges whenever , and diverges whenever . A related class of improper integrals is , which converges for , and diverges for .
Suppose that a company expects its annual profits years from now to be dollars and that interest is considered to be compounded continuously at an annual rate . Then the present value of all future profits can be shown to be
Radioactive substances decay exponentially: The mass at time is where is the initial mass and is a negative constant. The mean life M of an atom in the substance is
Given the function (in blue), consider the functions (in green) and (in red) graphed below which are continuous on . Assuming the graphs continues in the same way as goes to infinity, answer the following questions.
Sometimes we may encounter an improper integral for which we cannot easily evaluate the limit of the corresponding proper integrals. For instance, consider . While it is hard (or perhaps impossible) to find an antiderivative for , we can still determine whether or not the improper integral converges or diverges by comparison to a simpler one. Observe that for all ,, and therefore
for every . If we let so as to consider the two improper integrals and , we know that the larger of the two improper integrals converges. And thus, since the smaller one lies below a convergent integral, it follows that the smaller one must converge, too. In particular, must converge, even though we never explicitly evaluated the corresponding limit of proper integrals. We use this idea and similar ones in the exercises that follow.