Investigate!
Consider the recurrence relation
What sequence do you get if the initial conditions are Give a closed formula for this sequence.
What sequence do you get if the initial conditions are Give a closed formula.
What if and Find a closed formula.
We have seen that it is often easier to find recursive definitions than closed formulas. Lucky for us, there are a few techniques for converting recursive definitions to closed formulas. Doing so is called
solving a recurrence relation. Recall that the recurrence relation is a recursive definition without the initial conditions. For example, the recurrence relation for the Fibonacci sequence is
(This, together with the initial conditions
and
give the entire recursive
definition for the sequence.)
Example 2.4.1.
Find a recurrence relation and initial conditions for
Solution.
Finding the recurrence relation would be easier if we had some context for the problem (like the Tower of Hanoi, for example). Alas, we have only the sequence. Remember, the recurrence relation tells you how to get from previous terms to future terms. What is going on here? We could look at the differences between terms: Notice that these are growing by a factor of 3. Is the original sequence as well? and so on. It appears that we always end up with 2 less than the next term. Aha!
So is our recurrence relation and the initial condition is
We are going to try to
solve these recurrence relations. By this we mean something very similar to solving differential equations: we want to find a function of
(a closed formula) which satisfies the recurrence relation, as well as the initial condition. Just like for differential equations, finding a solution might be tricky, but checking that the solution is correct is easy.
Example 2.4.2.
Check that
is a solution to the recurrence relation
with
Solution.
First, it is easy to check the initial condition: should be according to our closed formula. Indeed, which is what we want. To check that our proposed solution satisfies the recurrence relation, try plugging it in.
That’s what our recurrence relation says! We have a solution.
Sometimes we can be clever and solve a recurrence relation by inspection. We generate the sequence using the recurrence relation and keep track of what we are doing so that we can see how to jump to finding just the
term. Here are two examples of how you might do that.
Telescoping refers to the phenomenon when many terms in a large sum cancel out—so the sum “telescopes.” For example:
because every third term looks like:
and then
and so on.
We can use this behavior to solve recurrence relations. Here is an example.
Example 2.4.3.
Solve the recurrence relation
with initial term
Solution.
To get a feel for the recurrence relation, write out the first few terms of the sequence: Look at the difference between terms. and and so on. The key thing here is that the difference between terms is We can write this explicitly: Of course, we could have arrived at this conclusion directly from the recurrence relation by subtracting from both sides.
Now use this equation over and over again, changing each time:
Add all these equations together. On the right-hand side, we get the sum We already know this can be simplified to What happens on the left-hand side? We get
This sum telescopes. We are left with only the from the first equation and the from the last equation. Putting this all together we have or But we know that So the solution to the recurrence relation, subject to the initial condition is
(Now that we know that, we should notice that the sequence is the result of adding 4 to each of the triangular numbers.)
The above example shows a way to solve recurrence relations of the form
where
has a known closed formula. If you rewrite the recurrence relation as
and then add up all the different equations with
ranging between 1 and
the left-hand side will always give you
The right-hand side will be
which is why we need to know the closed formula for that sum.
However, telescoping will not help us with a recursion such as
since the left-hand side will not telescope. You will have
’s but only one
However, we can still be clever if we use
iteration.
We have already seen an example of iteration when we found the closed formula for arithmetic and geometric sequences. The idea is, we
iterate the process of finding the next term, starting with the known initial condition, up until we have
Then we simplify. In the arithmetic sequence example, we simplified by multiplying
by the number of times we add it to
when we get to
to get from
to
To see how this works, let’s go through the same example we used for telescoping, but this time use iteration.
Example 2.4.4.
Use iteration to solve the recurrence relation
with
Solution.
Again, start by writing down the recurrence relation when This time, don’t subtract the terms to the other side:
Now but we know what is. By substitution, we get
Now go to using our known value of
We notice a pattern. Each time, we take the previous term and add the current index. So
Regrouping terms, we notice that is just plus the sum of the integers from to So, since
Of course in this case we still needed to know formula for the sum of
Let’s try iteration with a sequence for which telescoping doesn’t work.
Example 2.4.5.
Solve the recurrence relation
subject to
Solution.
Again, we iterate the recurrence relation, building up to the index
It is difficult to see what is happening here because we have to distribute all those 3’s. Let’s try again, this time simplifying a bit as we go.
Now we simplify. so we have Note that all the other terms have a 2 in them. In fact, we have a geometric sum with first term and common ratio We have seen how to simplify We get which simplifies to Putting this together with the first term gives our closed formula:
Iteration can be messy, but when the recurrence relation only refers to one previous term (and maybe some function of
) it can work well. However, trying to iterate a recurrence relation such as
will be way too complicated. We would need to keep track of two sets of previous terms, each of which were expressed by two previous terms, and so on. The length of the formula would grow exponentially (double each time, in fact). Luckily there happens to be a method for solving recurrence relations which works very well on relations like this.
Subsection The Characteristic Root Technique
Suppose we want to solve a recurrence relation expressed as a combination of the two previous terms, such as
In other words, we want to find a function of
which satisfies
Now iteration is too complicated, but think just for a second what would happen if we
did iterate. In each step, we would, among other things, multiply a previous iteration by 6. So our closed formula would include
multiplied some number of times. Thus it is reasonable to guess the solution will contain parts that look geometric. Perhaps the solution will take the form
for some constant
The nice thing is, we know how to check whether a formula is actually a solution to a recurrence relation: plug it in. What happens if we plug in
into the recursion above? We get
so by factoring,
or
(or
although this does not help us). This tells us that
is a solution to the recurrence relation, as is
Which one is correct? They both are, unless we specify initial conditions. Notice we could also have
Or
In fact, for any
and
is a solution (try plugging this into the recurrence relation). To find the values of
and
use the initial conditions.
This points us in the direction of a more general technique for solving recurrence relations. Notice we will always be able to factor out the
as we did above. So we really only care about the other part. We call this other part the
characteristic equation for the recurrence relation. We are interested in finding the roots of the characteristic equation, which are called (surprise) the
characteristic roots.
Characteristic Roots.
Given a recurrence relation
the
characteristic polynomial is
giving the
characteristic equation:
If
and
are two distinct roots of the characteristic polynomial (i.e., solutions to the characteristic equation), then the solution to the recurrence relation is
where
and
are constants determined by the initial conditions.
Example 2.4.6.
Solve the recurrence relation
with
and
Solution.
Rewrite the recurrence relation Now form the characteristic equation:
and solve for
so and are the characteristic roots. We therefore know that the solution to the recurrence relation will have the form
To find and plug in and to get a system of two equations with two unknowns:
Solving this system gives and so the solution to the recurrence relation is
Perhaps the most famous recurrence relation is
which together with the initial conditions
and
defines the Fibonacci sequence. But notice that this is precisely the type of recurrence relation on which we can use the characteristic root technique. When you do, the only thing that changes is that the characteristic equation does not factor, so you need to use the quadratic formula to find the characteristic roots. In fact, doing so gives the third most famous irrational number,
the
golden ratio.
Before leaving the characteristic root technique, we should think about what might happen when you solve the characteristic equation. We have an example above in which the characteristic polynomial has two distinct roots. These roots can be integers, or perhaps irrational numbers (requiring the quadratic formula to find them). In these cases, we know what the solution to the recurrence relation looks like.
However, it is possible for the characteristic polynomial to have only one root. This can happen if the characteristic polynomial factors as
It is still the case that
would be a solution to the recurrence relation, but we won’t be able to find solutions for all initial conditions using the general form
since we can’t distinguish between
and
We are in luck though:
Characteristic Root Technique for Repeated Roots.
Suppose the recurrence relation
has a characteristic polynomial with only one root
Then the solution to the recurrence relation is
where
and
are constants determined by the initial conditions.
Notice the extra
in
This allows us to solve for the constants
and
from the initial conditions.
Example 2.4.7.
Solve the recurrence relation
with initial conditions
and
Solution.
The characteristic polynomial is We solve the characteristic equation
by factoring:
so is the only characteristic root. Therefore we know that the solution to the recurrence relation has the form
for some constants and Now use the initial conditions:
Since we find that Therefore the solution to the recurrence relation is
Although we will not consider examples more complicated than these, this characteristic root technique can be applied to much more complicated recurrence relations. For example,
has characteristic polynomial
Assuming you see how to factor such a degree 3 (or more) polynomial you can easily find the characteristic roots and as such solve the recurrence relation (the solution would look like
if there were 3 distinct roots). It is also possible that the characteristics roots are complex numbers.
However, the characteristic root technique is only useful for solving recurrence relations in a particular form:
is given as a linear combination of some number of previous terms. These recurrence relations are called
linear homogeneous recurrence relations with constant coefficients. The “homogeneous” refers to the fact that there is no additional term in the recurrence relation other than a multiple of
terms. For example,
is
non-homogeneous because of the additional constant 1. There are general methods of solving such things, but we will not consider them here, other than through the use of telescoping or iteration described above.